Showing results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: The focus of the media

  1. #1
    Is this loli?
    Enlightened
    banana_sam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Cambridge, MA
    Posts
    2,653

    Default The focus of the media

    I've found, to my dismay, that the media seems to focus too much on violence -- especially regarding the Iraq war. While it is important to show us the reality of the situation, I've noticed that I've been desensitized. Stories about wayward bombs destroying children's hospitals used to eat away at me, but now I'm completely unaffected. I turn on CNN, and it's always the same spread: some car bombing in Iraq, Bush visits some leader, and bird flu. At this point, I feel that the entire city of Baghdad could be leveled, and I wouldn't even flinch. What do you guys think?

  2. #2
    Director of the Thought Police Senior Member

    Zealot
    ComradeSlavic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    723

    Default

    I'm pretty sure that the fact that the media reports so much of the same bull**** over and over combined with the place being halfway around the world makes most people just not care. The fact is that if you aren't even affected by violent news then why would they report wimpy news which would most likely affect you even less.
    * WAR IS PEACE
    * FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
    * IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

    "The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake...We are different from all the oligarchies of the past, in that we know what we are doing. All the others, even those who resembled ourselves, were cowards and hypocrites."

    "And if all others accepted the lie which the party imposed-if all records told the same tale-then the lie passed into history and became the truth."



    "excellent work sir. i personally have never gone down after blowin the load. what's the point? i got mine ho, see ya"
    -ston3rpimp69

  3. #3
    Is this loli?
    Enlightened
    banana_sam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Cambridge, MA
    Posts
    2,653

    Default

    Well, ultimately reporting should not be aimed at "affecting" people, though I made that a big point in my previous post. It should be an objective observation that shows us the truth about an issue. At the moment, CNN especially, seems to be overly chummy with President Bush. Even during Katrina, when all other news organizations were pointing fingers at the man's idiocy, CNN rarely ran any sort of derogatory report. What kind of news is that?

    Reality cannot be displayed with a story about Iraq, one about Bush, and one about bird flu. Too often, the media seems to omit the bigger picture and stick with what "sells". What a shame.

  4. #4
    E pluribus unum Senior Member
    Retired Staff Member

    Messiah
    hba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Still Florida
    Posts
    8,523

    Default

    Honestly, here in America, why are we supposed to care what the f*ck happens outside the country. We're not obligated as citizens to stick our noses into every other country's business.

    Bad to sound selfish, but aside from the Red Cross and charity organizations to help those affected by natural disasters and such, we shouldn't be trying to turn over a country into something that we want to it to look like. Who are we to change their upbringing?
    Nature Of The Humans Is Never Giving

  5. #5
    Akazukin
    Guest

    Default

    I'll take 'media' as motion pictures. Television's sole purpose is for entertainment. Although it's now as effective as newspapers, you dont want to see a guy standing there and read you the news. You want to see some actions.

    Like what banana said, it "sells" - media news is also a form of business. If the television only boardcast long and mono-tone news, advertisers will have no confidence on it. Their business will face difficulties.

    Since the production of newspaper are cheaper, we can expect to get more solid news from the papers. A writer can work alone and has no need for electronic equipments.

    A person with basic knowledge will benefit more from media boardcast. Media news also appeals to the laziness in us. We just sit down and turn on the TV. Is it a correct way to show our concern towards the world?

    I would say the media business are not to be blamed, unless you pay for the News media like the way you pay for newspapers. If media are really that effective and accurate, why do we still buy newspapers? the Media is only like a graphic add-on. Its an optional plug in for your general knowledge.

  6. #6

    Advocate
    duff_man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    So. Cali
    Posts
    197

    Default

    To me television media is a waste of time. They are just talking heads pretty much sighting their opinions on the people that are watching the program. That is why I try to get most of my information off the internet, on a site such as Yahoo! since you dont have to deal with the fact that their trying to change you to their cause.

    Also television and the newspaper are going to keep doing that, sporting what sells. After all in the end everybody is motivated by money. I don't care how much a saint you think you are.

  7. #7
    primum non nocere Senior Member
    Gold Member

    Inquisitor
    han_han's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    4,329

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Akazukin
    I'll take 'media' as motion pictures. Television's sole purpose is for entertainment. Although it's now as effective as newspapers, you dont want to see a guy standing there and read you the news. You want to see some actions.

    Like what banana said, it "sells" - media news is also a form of business. If the television only boardcast long and mono-tone news, advertisers will have no confidence on it. Their business will face difficulties.

    Since the production of newspaper are cheaper, we can expect to get more solid news from the papers. A writer can work alone and has no need for electronic equipments.

    A person with basic knowledge will benefit more from media boardcast. Media news also appeals to the laziness in us. We just sit down and turn on the TV. Is it a correct way to show our concern towards the world?

    I would say the media business are not to be blamed, unless you pay for the News media like the way you pay for newspapers. If media are really that effective and accurate, why do we still buy newspapers? the Media is only like a graphic add-on. Its an optional plug in for your general knowledge.
    I agree. What the media shows us is what we, as the general population, would like to see. Although few would admit it, we'd much rather see violent and serious situations rather than boring and mild situations. We are entertained by excitement and bored by inactivity. Somewhere along the line, violence is just more "fun." The new generation seems to be very oriented on violence as well. A lot of kids these days are playing games that have to do with violence and severe situations. To be in a severe situation is exciting, and exciting things sell. Therefore, it wouldn't be too absurd to make a conjecture that the media, which is entertainment, would do this for ratings.

    Many forms of publication control the general population; by affecting general knowledge you affect the way they think. What if they were showing these "bad" things so that we'd see the world as a bad place and work harder towards making it better? After all, it would work if the general population was influenced to think that the world is a horrible place. They'd take action against the bad things or at least start a chain of actions leading to the final action that corrects the "bad" thing on the news.

  8. #8
    There's too much blood in my caffeine system
    Crusader
    EyeOfFire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Australia. Respect it
    Posts
    3,345

    Default

    It's the whole theory of the monkeysphere, not your being desensetised.

    http://www.pointlesswasteoftime.com/monkeysphere.html - go there. I'm not in the mood to explain it.

    Basically, you couldn't care less about the city of baghdad being leveled because it doesn't affect you. None of the bombings affect you, none of the people that die are in your monkeysphere. Stories that the news portrayed no longer impact you because you've seen them all before - the Baghdad situation is simply turning from a new exiting development to something that's been going on for a while that we've all seen before. The only time you'd care about other people is if the situation is new or exiting or even just different. The current Bagdhad situation is turning from different to monotonous - it has nothing to do with your being desensitised

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Media Error
    By DA( in forum General Chat
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-21-2005, 02:29 PM
  2. Starcraft Media 'Plugin'.
    By K? Pŕo?ćtiόnŹ in forum Starcraft/Brood War
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 08-28-2005, 04:20 PM
  3. Having media codec problems?
    By gamepin126 in forum General Chat
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 06-17-2005, 03:58 PM
  4. How to take screenshots in Media Player Classic
    By Siege-Tank in forum Hardware and Software
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-27-2004, 10:13 AM

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •