PDA

View Full Version : flames:SelectionMassHack?



llafnwod
05-21-2005, 03:55 PM
wan't me to post the code? lolFor the last ****ing time (not really, I'll have to say it many times afterwards) a disassembly is NOT THE SOURCE CODE.

dt
05-21-2005, 03:58 PM
Lol, I remember.

Taking a page out of Fish Beans' book, a mentally retarded clam with schizophrenia and a malignant tumor twice it's size can disassemble a DLL, and that clam would know that that isn't the same thing as the source code.
:lol:

jonniewaka
05-21-2005, 04:00 PM
For the last ****ing time (not really, I'll have to say it many times afterwards) a disassembly is NOT THE SOURCE CODE.
foir the last ****ing time if you odnt know what your sayoing just shut the **** up..you get codes from disassembly by opening it in disassembler it gives u raw codes.if you know what offsets for what..its no hard to figure out...

saren
05-21-2005, 04:26 PM
foir the last ****ing time if you odnt know what your sayoing just shut the **** up..you get codes from disassembly by opening it in disassembler it gives u raw codes.if you know what offsets for what..its no hard to figure out...


ROFLMAO! HOLY **** LOLCANO! Omfg, I just laughed myself into a fit, roflcakes, omfg. Ahahahahaha.

Jonniewaka, you win the dumbass prize - forever.



And now to elaborate on the difference between source and taking apart a library.

Source is the actual text version of the code that is then compiled into said dll.

Taking apart the .dll to examine it's internal components (such as using a resource explorer or the like) is not the same. It simply shows what is in the .dll (anything from pictures/icons used, to sounds, to other files, not just data), it is STILL compiled. The only way you can 'see' the source code is if you reverse-engineer the hexidecimal breakdown of it that you get when you look at the internal workings of a dll.

jonniewaka
05-21-2005, 04:32 PM
ROFLMAO! HOLY **** LOLCANO! Omfg, I just laughed myself into a fit, roflcakes, omfg. Ahahahahaha.

Jonniewaka, you win the dumbass prize - forever.



And now to elaborate on the difference between source and taking apart a library.

Source is the actual text version of the code that is then compiled into said dll.

Taking apart the .dll to examine it's internal components (such as using a resource explorer or the like) is not the same. It simply shows what is in the .dll (anything from pictures/icons used, to sounds, to other files, not just data), it is STILL compiled. The only way you can 'see' the source code is if you reverse-engineer the hexidecimal breakdown of it that you get when you look at the internal workings of a dll.


hahah are you ****ing retarded??
now listen. if you disassembly a dll in a disassembler you get raw codes. and with those raw codes u can "find" them with corresponding offsets and its not hard to get source code from it.. hey SAREN..just shut ur mouth cuz ur the only one who doesnt know..

saren
05-21-2005, 04:38 PM
hahah are you ****ing retarded??
now listen. if you disassembly a dll in a disassembler you get raw codes. and with those raw codes u can "find" them with corresponding offsets and its not hard to get source code from it.. hey SAREN..just shut ur mouth cuz ur the only one who doesnt know..

What the heck is 'raw codes'? And finding offsets after you've taken apart a dll into its individual components and can see the addresses of each line? Boggle? Do you even know what a dynamic library is? Or what the process of disassembly entails?

jonniewaka
05-21-2005, 04:40 PM
What the heck is 'raw codes'? And finding offsets after you've taken apart a dll into its individual components and can see the addresses of each line? Boggle? Do you even know what a dynamic library is? Or what the process of disassembly entails?
did u ever disassemble a dll before? OMG just shut ur ****ing mouthor ask someone what i just said..they'll know wat it means..its your ****ing retarded head that just dont know what yur talking bout..damn...raw codes meaning not actualy source codes but conenction to the offsets and "raw codes" ...dumb****..raw codes doesnt mean source codes. and its the codes taht get you confused you ****ing fag..damn..ur just ****ing clueless college kid who should just die one day of overdose..

saren
05-21-2005, 04:46 PM
Hello class,

Today we will be discussing dissection of a completely incomprehensible post.


did u ever disassemble a dll before?

Nope. Never.


OMG just shut ur ****ing mouthor ask someone what i just said..they'll know wat it means..

I did ask someone. I copy and pasted your reply to them, they came with "that guy could take English lessons from Bush."


its your ****ing retarded head that just dont know what yur talking bout..damn...raw codes meaning not actualy source codes but conenction to the offsets and "raw codes"

Since it's hard to tell where one sentence starts and ends, or how your malformed ideas progress from one point into another, I will simply cut it here and examinine it.

So you are telling me that "raw codes aren't actually source codes," right? Well no ****. Second, you prattle on about "connection to the offsets" and "raw codes" again. I can't even begin to decipher what this means, because quite frankly an offset is just an address and again, what is 'raw code'? Are you talking about hex?


...dumb****..raw codes doesnt mean source codes. and its the codes taht get you confused you ****ing fag..damn..ur just ****ing clueless college kid who should just die one day of overdose..

How, again, can you flame the hell out of me in a non-flaming forum and remain unscathed by moderation is beyond me. But you still haven't even gotten anywhere in explaining your side.

jonniewaka
05-21-2005, 04:53 PM
Hello class,

Today we will be discussing dissection of a completely incomprehensible post.



Nope. Never.



I did ask someone. I copy and pasted your reply to them, they came with "that guy could take English lessons from Bush."



Since it's hard to tell where one sentence starts and ends, or how your malformed ideas progress from one point into another, I will simply cut it here and examinine it.

So you are telling me that "raw codes aren't actually source codes," right? Well no ****. Second, you prattle on about "connection to the offsets" and "raw codes" again. I can't even begin to decipher what this means, because quite frankly an offset is just an address and again, what is 'raw code'? Are you talking about hex?



How, again, can you flame the hell out of me in a non-flaming forum and remain unscathed by moderation is beyond me. But you still haven't even gotten anywhere in explaining your side.
why have you changed your subject..why dont you pretend to know more bout disaasemble??now i can see you just a ****tard thats 12 yrs old..you dont know shiit..

saren
05-21-2005, 04:55 PM
why have you changed your subject..why dont you pretend to know more bout disaasemble??now i can see you just a ****tard thats 12 yrs old..you dont know shiit..

I didn't change the subject. I can't even UNDERSTAND what you are saying. How you will pass High school English I can't even begin to fathom.

But, explain yourself. Clearly and without the spam use of profanity and random bad spelling/grammar.

jonniewaka
05-21-2005, 05:01 PM
I didn't change the subject. I can't even UNDERSTAND what you are saying. How you will pass High school English I can't even begin to fathom.

But, explain yourself. Clearly and without the spam use of profanity and random bad spelling/grammar.
first of all i m done with you.,,cuz you just dont know **** bout assembly codes.and if you cant understand me who's gonna understand this?How you will pass High school English I can't even begin to fathom.
How you will pass High school English I can't even begin to fathom.
How you will pass High school English I can't even begin to fathom.
well what does that mean?

BlaZeR
05-21-2005, 06:45 PM
I didn't change the subject. I can't even UNDERSTAND what you are saying. How you will pass High school English I can't even begin to fathom.

But, explain yourself. Clearly and without the spam use of profanity and random bad spelling/grammar.
He said he dropped out of school in year 8 because his parents were drug addicts.

Ganondorf
05-21-2005, 07:12 PM
first of all i m done with you.,,cuz you just dont know **** bout assembly codes.and if you cant understand me who's gonna understand this?How you will pass High school English I can't even begin to fathom.
How you will pass High school English I can't even begin to fathom.
How you will pass High school English I can't even begin to fathom.
well what does that mean?

Thats a 5th grade word. Here is what he means:
How you will pass high school english I can't begin to understand.
How you will pass high school english I can't begin to understand.
How you will pass high school english I can't begin to understand.
I wrote it 3 times so I could be cool like you.

And saren, don't think I'm on your side. I will remain nuetral.

BloodyBlade
05-21-2005, 07:32 PM
What the f*ck hapened to the BWHacks.com boards?

Oh yeah, saren, jonnie, and the other spam-f*cks.

Admins/Mods: I request that you start being a bit more hard on the spammers.

jonniewaka
05-21-2005, 07:36 PM
What the f*ck hapened to the BWHacks.com boards?

Oh yeah, saren, jonnie, and the other spam-f*cks.

Admins/Mods: I request that you start being a bit more hard on the spammers.
hey ur a big part of the fuc k list...and you just spamed you ****ing fruitcake..

DA(
05-21-2005, 08:29 PM
jonnie changed his name to daholyfag becuase he was flammed 2 much

gamepin126
05-21-2005, 08:30 PM
If I remember correctly rangedunits posted a source code that will do exactly the same thing as mass selection or whatever that name was. I'm not implying that what ranged posted was the source of that hack(if you want to call it that). I think nickolay(don't correct me if I'm wrong, I don't care) posted a WAY more efficient code doing the exact same thing.

AgentGod is a hack. End of story, can we all be friends and stop flaming each other. All this noobish flaming of EVERYONE is degrading the quality of BWHacks.

EDIT: I've come to expect random flames from everyone on this forum, except for a couple of mods, and 1 other person. Why must you people act like idiots and continue pointless conspiracies and idle babbling.

BloodyBlade
05-21-2005, 11:47 PM
hey ur a big part of the fuc k list...and you just spamed you ****ing fruitcake..

Oh noes! I made one spam post in the flame board. That instantly brings me down to your status as a BWHacks member. Your logic is flawless!

I would be content if you were raped by a pack of wolves, then ran over by a big rig you incompetant sack of ****.

By the way, fruitcakes are inanimate objects; incabable of thinking, typing, and motion. I thought you may not realize this, because, you know, you ride the short bus.

Perma
05-22-2005, 07:03 AM
hahah are you ****ing retarded??
now listen. if you disassembly a dll in a disassembler you get raw codes. and with those raw codes u can "find" them with corresponding offsets and its not hard to get source code from it.. hey SAREN..just shut ur mouth cuz ur the only one who doesnt know..

So what you're saying is you can magically "find" the source code by examining the disassembled file internals? I wish I could do that. :rolleyes:

In the case of a dynamic link library, it's possible to obtain the source of a hack simply by sifting through and making sense of the disassembly. But I think you're confused as to why this is the case. Of course, there are tools such as packers that make analysing a disassembly tedious work.

Dan
05-22-2005, 07:50 AM
Posting in this thread to say that DAHOLYONE just made me gouge out my eyeballs with an unsharpened pencil due to his blatant ignorance and abuse of the English language. I happen to enjoy literature, from novels to poetry and prose, and quite frankly, the butchering that has occured here has left me with no options but to remove my ability to see. The atrocious manner of posting by the average BWHacks.com user is bad enough (u substituted for you, ur substituted for your, lack of capitals, run-on sentences, misspellings, their/they're/there, whose/whos, no/know, semicolons, stupid internet acronyms, etc...), but DAHOLYONE seriously takes the cake. It's as if his keyboard's keys are magically moving, so that he has to hunt and find every letter, and by the time he's managed to complete a single word his train of thought has completely shifted. Or, he's just a retarded middle school student with severe attention deficit disorder and the motor skills of a three-toed sloth.

kds
05-22-2005, 08:08 AM
Well said Dan. :)

gamepin126
05-22-2005, 08:49 AM
Are you gonn have to surf the brail internet now? BRAIL PORNO FOREVER!!!!