indulgence
06-30-2004, 09:36 AM
Copyright 1988 (12:52:37 PM): hey baby
TouchTheTiny (12:52:44 PM): hi
Copyright 1988 (12:53:44 PM): wanna voip me
Copyright 1988 (12:53:54 PM): or let me drop you line
TouchTheTiny (12:54:24 PM): why
TouchTheTiny (12:54:34 PM): i thought you thought i was a guy*rolls eyes*
Copyright 1988 (12:55:15 PM): well - you can prove me wrong then ?
TouchTheTiny (12:55:29 PM): yes i can but what will that accomplish?
Copyright 1988 (12:55:51 PM): proof of identity goes a long way
Copyright 1988 (12:56:00 PM): when i suspect you of being one "BrokenArrow"
Copyright 1988 (12:56:16 PM): or um wait lemme see what other aliases use your ip subnet
TouchTheTiny (12:56:22 PM): well it is your choice if you think ima guy w/e
TouchTheTiny (12:56:36 PM): theres BrokenArrow/Miss/T3CH and my brothers old one RaptorHunter13
TouchTheTiny (12:56:47 PM): funny thing is i dont even
TouchTheTiny (12:56:53 PM): I use plain old Rogers cable
TouchTheTiny (12:56:59 PM): and do nothing
TouchTheTiny (12:57:11 PM): it is very fucked up though
Copyright 1988 (12:57:14 PM): well then -- you can put my skepticism to rest
TouchTheTiny (12:57:20 PM): if i restart my computer
Copyright 1988 (12:57:23 PM): as it is very funny that broken arrow and you
TouchTheTiny (12:57:24 PM): it says no connection found
Copyright 1988 (12:57:32 PM): both mispell "possible"
Copyright 1988 (12:57:34 PM): the same way
Copyright 1988 (12:57:37 PM): POSSIABLE
TouchTheTiny (12:57:40 PM): actually
TouchTheTiny (12:58:07 PM): in canada we spell it possiable its like colour in america its color in canada its colour
TouchTheTiny (12:58:15 PM): and BrokenArrow is me
Copyright 1988 (12:58:26 PM): well then you can put the skepticism to rest
Copyright 1988 (12:58:53 PM): becaue theres more skeptecism than just this -- but this is a step
TouchTheTiny (12:59:19 PM): you made it you deal with it
TouchTheTiny (12:59:46 PM): i dont see why i have to go out of my way to proove anything for a bunch of asshole perverts
TouchTheTiny (12:59:53 PM): its not my fault they dont believe
Copyright 1988 (1:00:10 PM): um - well you make some outrageous claims
Copyright 1988 (1:00:17 PM): and no proof of identity other than an 'avatar'
Copyright 1988 (1:00:29 PM): well then look ima female too
Copyright 1988 (1:00:31 PM): ive got a lady avatar
TouchTheTiny (1:00:54 PM): take it from this
TouchTheTiny (1:01:03 PM): did i ever say that i was a girl?
Copyright 1988 (1:01:54 PM): lol no but you um portray that image
Copyright 1988 (1:01:59 PM): and you do so blatantly
Copyright 1988 (1:02:17 PM): ergo your implication that you are female is tied to the implication that your avatar is you
Copyright 1988 (1:02:24 PM): ergo my skepticism
TouchTheTiny (1:05:43 PM): I guess thats true but I know I am and don't need to prove it. Thats what counts. If you were on my friend I wouldn't mind but for the fact that I must prove to you dumbfounded people no
Copyright 1988 (1:06:20 PM): lol - see your notion of dismissing my valid criticisms is typical
Copyright 1988 (1:06:25 PM): you don't want to be discovered
Copyright 1988 (1:06:39 PM): i have offered perfectly legitimate means by which you could prove yourself
Copyright 1988 (1:06:47 PM): you make outrageous claims to hacks
Copyright 1988 (1:06:50 PM): coding in C++
TouchTheTiny (1:07:00 PM): btw
Copyright 1988 (1:07:05 PM): do you even know assembly?
TouchTheTiny (1:07:46 PM): "our proof involves sentence structure and word usage, ips, and email addresses.... as well as a few *cough* other items." what is this?
Copyright 1988 (1:08:04 PM): proof we have...
Copyright 1988 (1:08:11 PM): but answer my question and ill answer yours
Copyright 1988 (1:08:18 PM): do you know assembly?
TouchTheTiny (1:08:28 PM): i was asking first
Copyright 1988 (1:08:48 PM): no you werent
TouchTheTiny (1:08:50 PM): proove of what
Copyright 1988 (1:08:52 PM): i asked i can see when you type
TouchTheTiny (1:08:53 PM): poof*
Copyright 1988 (1:09:03 PM): im not asking for proof on this question necessarily --
TouchTheTiny (1:09:04 PM): i typed btw
Copyright 1988 (1:09:08 PM): DO YOU KNOW ASSEMBLY?!
TouchTheTiny (1:09:40 PM): hmmm I wouldn't have done it without
Copyright 1988 (1:11:00 PM): you wouldnt have done what without
Copyright 1988 (1:11:01 PM): what
TouchTheTiny (1:12:50 PM): ok yes i do
Copyright 1988 (1:13:04 PM): so youve gone through the starcraft disassembly i would presume
Copyright 1988 (1:13:13 PM): and youve run across this much like me a lot
Copyright 1988 (1:13:21 PM):
neg eax
sbb eax, eax
Copyright 1988 (1:13:27 PM): and you would know what that does right?
Copyright 1988 (1:15:20 PM): long pause *
Copyright 1988 (1:15:38 PM): http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-...art+of+assembly (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=art+of+assembly)
Copyright 1988 (1:15:45 PM): sigh i know you are googling it probably
Copyright 1988 (1:15:59 PM): but that wont tell you the context of what its doing
Copyright 1988 (1:16:03 PM): ive seen it tons in starcraft
Copyright 1988 (1:16:18 PM): in some sections of code that you would have to have debugged a lot to create these 'hacks' you have
Copyright 1988 (1:16:42 PM): it just so happens to be how ms compiler compiles a certain set of code
Copyright 1988 (1:17:39 PM): wow -- no response?
Copyright 1988 (1:17:53 PM): hey honey -- why do you have to lie for?
Copyright 1988 (1:18:10 PM): half of the hacks you claim are impossible
Copyright 1988 (1:18:23 PM): the others are either so debugging intensive that i don't believe you
Copyright 1988 (1:18:33 PM): but i was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt
Copyright 1988 (1:19:52 PM): I mean you would obviously have the fxn offset to send unit commands as well then huh?
Copyright 1988 (1:20:09 PM): i mean its widely known that me, drakken, dt maybe others have it
Copyright 1988 (1:20:27 PM): so surely you have it too -- especially w/ auto build of scarabs - interceptors etc
Copyright 1988 (1:20:30 PM): and auto mining
Copyright 1988 (1:20:37 PM): all of those automations
Copyright 1988 (1:20:50 PM): so -- ill give you the 1 last chance -- this ones easy mind you
Copyright 1988 (1:21:02 PM): to prove yourself -- what is the fxn offset to send unit commands in starcraft
Copyright 1988 (1:21:21 PM): and i await your improbable response
TouchTheTiny (1:23:22 PM): http://www.bwhacks.com/forum/index.php?act...st=45#entry3203 (http://www.bwhacks.com/forum/index.php?act=ST&f=8&t=381&st=45#entry3203)
TouchTheTiny (1:23:39 PM): now that u have wasted more of my time making me have to write so much again i hope u=
TouchTheTiny (1:23:44 PM): ur happy
Copyright 1988 (1:25:49 PM): lol
Copyright 1988 (1:25:54 PM): so no fxn offset eh
Copyright 1988 (1:26:00 PM): LOL figured as much
Copyright 1988 (1:26:23 PM): you cant share minerals
Copyright 1988 (1:26:27 PM): not possible dumbass
Copyright 1988 (1:26:34 PM): if you give minerals to an ally
Copyright 1988 (1:26:38 PM): say subtract urs
Copyright 1988 (1:26:40 PM): and add his
Copyright 1988 (1:26:50 PM): it will drop him when he spends the extra
Copyright 1988 (1:27:07 PM): mineral hack - impossible
Copyright 1988 (1:27:10 PM): synched on all clients
Copyright 1988 (1:27:17 PM): much like the stack hack
Copyright 1988 (1:27:21 PM): and fastest ladder
Copyright 1988 (1:27:28 PM): NOT FUCKING POSSIBLE
Copyright 1988 (1:29:05 PM): and its also amazing that you retrieve ip from players during the map download
Copyright 1988 (1:29:11 PM): because i have debugged that thread
Copyright 1988 (1:29:14 PM): extensibly
Copyright 1988 (1:29:35 PM): i was able to spoof download counter through my debugging efforts
Copyright 1988 (1:29:44 PM): thats one i found personally - not drakken
Copyright 1988 (1:29:57 PM): and it lead to other -- better -- hacks
Copyright 1988 (1:30:12 PM): yet -- much as i try i never saw any new connection thread opened
Copyright 1988 (1:30:28 PM): as you claim
Copyright 1988 (1:31:07 PM): but - as i posted -- ill eat crow on all this if i test
Copyright 1988 (1:31:25 PM): but i will of coures put it through the ringer first - and i will have formatted my hd first
Copyright 1988 (1:31:44 PM): but you never answered what
Copyright 1988 (1:31:51 PM):
neg eax
sbb eax, eax
Copyright 1988 (1:31:54 PM): meant in assembly
TouchTheTiny is away at 1:32:08 PM.
Copyright 1988 (1:32:19 PM): if (eax != 0) eax = -1;
Copyright 1988 (1:32:32 PM): and its HAMBURGLERS you pwned bitch
The master of question dodging lives amongst us -- MISS. In her down time she enjoys suckering noobs and spreading deciet. She enjoys long bullshit conversations and stringing noobs on by making false claims.
If you spot bullshitter -- vote yes
TouchTheTiny (12:52:44 PM): hi
Copyright 1988 (12:53:44 PM): wanna voip me
Copyright 1988 (12:53:54 PM): or let me drop you line
TouchTheTiny (12:54:24 PM): why
TouchTheTiny (12:54:34 PM): i thought you thought i was a guy*rolls eyes*
Copyright 1988 (12:55:15 PM): well - you can prove me wrong then ?
TouchTheTiny (12:55:29 PM): yes i can but what will that accomplish?
Copyright 1988 (12:55:51 PM): proof of identity goes a long way
Copyright 1988 (12:56:00 PM): when i suspect you of being one "BrokenArrow"
Copyright 1988 (12:56:16 PM): or um wait lemme see what other aliases use your ip subnet
TouchTheTiny (12:56:22 PM): well it is your choice if you think ima guy w/e
TouchTheTiny (12:56:36 PM): theres BrokenArrow/Miss/T3CH and my brothers old one RaptorHunter13
TouchTheTiny (12:56:47 PM): funny thing is i dont even
TouchTheTiny (12:56:53 PM): I use plain old Rogers cable
TouchTheTiny (12:56:59 PM): and do nothing
TouchTheTiny (12:57:11 PM): it is very fucked up though
Copyright 1988 (12:57:14 PM): well then -- you can put my skepticism to rest
TouchTheTiny (12:57:20 PM): if i restart my computer
Copyright 1988 (12:57:23 PM): as it is very funny that broken arrow and you
TouchTheTiny (12:57:24 PM): it says no connection found
Copyright 1988 (12:57:32 PM): both mispell "possible"
Copyright 1988 (12:57:34 PM): the same way
Copyright 1988 (12:57:37 PM): POSSIABLE
TouchTheTiny (12:57:40 PM): actually
TouchTheTiny (12:58:07 PM): in canada we spell it possiable its like colour in america its color in canada its colour
TouchTheTiny (12:58:15 PM): and BrokenArrow is me
Copyright 1988 (12:58:26 PM): well then you can put the skepticism to rest
Copyright 1988 (12:58:53 PM): becaue theres more skeptecism than just this -- but this is a step
TouchTheTiny (12:59:19 PM): you made it you deal with it
TouchTheTiny (12:59:46 PM): i dont see why i have to go out of my way to proove anything for a bunch of asshole perverts
TouchTheTiny (12:59:53 PM): its not my fault they dont believe
Copyright 1988 (1:00:10 PM): um - well you make some outrageous claims
Copyright 1988 (1:00:17 PM): and no proof of identity other than an 'avatar'
Copyright 1988 (1:00:29 PM): well then look ima female too
Copyright 1988 (1:00:31 PM): ive got a lady avatar
TouchTheTiny (1:00:54 PM): take it from this
TouchTheTiny (1:01:03 PM): did i ever say that i was a girl?
Copyright 1988 (1:01:54 PM): lol no but you um portray that image
Copyright 1988 (1:01:59 PM): and you do so blatantly
Copyright 1988 (1:02:17 PM): ergo your implication that you are female is tied to the implication that your avatar is you
Copyright 1988 (1:02:24 PM): ergo my skepticism
TouchTheTiny (1:05:43 PM): I guess thats true but I know I am and don't need to prove it. Thats what counts. If you were on my friend I wouldn't mind but for the fact that I must prove to you dumbfounded people no
Copyright 1988 (1:06:20 PM): lol - see your notion of dismissing my valid criticisms is typical
Copyright 1988 (1:06:25 PM): you don't want to be discovered
Copyright 1988 (1:06:39 PM): i have offered perfectly legitimate means by which you could prove yourself
Copyright 1988 (1:06:47 PM): you make outrageous claims to hacks
Copyright 1988 (1:06:50 PM): coding in C++
TouchTheTiny (1:07:00 PM): btw
Copyright 1988 (1:07:05 PM): do you even know assembly?
TouchTheTiny (1:07:46 PM): "our proof involves sentence structure and word usage, ips, and email addresses.... as well as a few *cough* other items." what is this?
Copyright 1988 (1:08:04 PM): proof we have...
Copyright 1988 (1:08:11 PM): but answer my question and ill answer yours
Copyright 1988 (1:08:18 PM): do you know assembly?
TouchTheTiny (1:08:28 PM): i was asking first
Copyright 1988 (1:08:48 PM): no you werent
TouchTheTiny (1:08:50 PM): proove of what
Copyright 1988 (1:08:52 PM): i asked i can see when you type
TouchTheTiny (1:08:53 PM): poof*
Copyright 1988 (1:09:03 PM): im not asking for proof on this question necessarily --
TouchTheTiny (1:09:04 PM): i typed btw
Copyright 1988 (1:09:08 PM): DO YOU KNOW ASSEMBLY?!
TouchTheTiny (1:09:40 PM): hmmm I wouldn't have done it without
Copyright 1988 (1:11:00 PM): you wouldnt have done what without
Copyright 1988 (1:11:01 PM): what
TouchTheTiny (1:12:50 PM): ok yes i do
Copyright 1988 (1:13:04 PM): so youve gone through the starcraft disassembly i would presume
Copyright 1988 (1:13:13 PM): and youve run across this much like me a lot
Copyright 1988 (1:13:21 PM):
neg eax
sbb eax, eax
Copyright 1988 (1:13:27 PM): and you would know what that does right?
Copyright 1988 (1:15:20 PM): long pause *
Copyright 1988 (1:15:38 PM): http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-...art+of+assembly (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=art+of+assembly)
Copyright 1988 (1:15:45 PM): sigh i know you are googling it probably
Copyright 1988 (1:15:59 PM): but that wont tell you the context of what its doing
Copyright 1988 (1:16:03 PM): ive seen it tons in starcraft
Copyright 1988 (1:16:18 PM): in some sections of code that you would have to have debugged a lot to create these 'hacks' you have
Copyright 1988 (1:16:42 PM): it just so happens to be how ms compiler compiles a certain set of code
Copyright 1988 (1:17:39 PM): wow -- no response?
Copyright 1988 (1:17:53 PM): hey honey -- why do you have to lie for?
Copyright 1988 (1:18:10 PM): half of the hacks you claim are impossible
Copyright 1988 (1:18:23 PM): the others are either so debugging intensive that i don't believe you
Copyright 1988 (1:18:33 PM): but i was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt
Copyright 1988 (1:19:52 PM): I mean you would obviously have the fxn offset to send unit commands as well then huh?
Copyright 1988 (1:20:09 PM): i mean its widely known that me, drakken, dt maybe others have it
Copyright 1988 (1:20:27 PM): so surely you have it too -- especially w/ auto build of scarabs - interceptors etc
Copyright 1988 (1:20:30 PM): and auto mining
Copyright 1988 (1:20:37 PM): all of those automations
Copyright 1988 (1:20:50 PM): so -- ill give you the 1 last chance -- this ones easy mind you
Copyright 1988 (1:21:02 PM): to prove yourself -- what is the fxn offset to send unit commands in starcraft
Copyright 1988 (1:21:21 PM): and i await your improbable response
TouchTheTiny (1:23:22 PM): http://www.bwhacks.com/forum/index.php?act...st=45#entry3203 (http://www.bwhacks.com/forum/index.php?act=ST&f=8&t=381&st=45#entry3203)
TouchTheTiny (1:23:39 PM): now that u have wasted more of my time making me have to write so much again i hope u=
TouchTheTiny (1:23:44 PM): ur happy
Copyright 1988 (1:25:49 PM): lol
Copyright 1988 (1:25:54 PM): so no fxn offset eh
Copyright 1988 (1:26:00 PM): LOL figured as much
Copyright 1988 (1:26:23 PM): you cant share minerals
Copyright 1988 (1:26:27 PM): not possible dumbass
Copyright 1988 (1:26:34 PM): if you give minerals to an ally
Copyright 1988 (1:26:38 PM): say subtract urs
Copyright 1988 (1:26:40 PM): and add his
Copyright 1988 (1:26:50 PM): it will drop him when he spends the extra
Copyright 1988 (1:27:07 PM): mineral hack - impossible
Copyright 1988 (1:27:10 PM): synched on all clients
Copyright 1988 (1:27:17 PM): much like the stack hack
Copyright 1988 (1:27:21 PM): and fastest ladder
Copyright 1988 (1:27:28 PM): NOT FUCKING POSSIBLE
Copyright 1988 (1:29:05 PM): and its also amazing that you retrieve ip from players during the map download
Copyright 1988 (1:29:11 PM): because i have debugged that thread
Copyright 1988 (1:29:14 PM): extensibly
Copyright 1988 (1:29:35 PM): i was able to spoof download counter through my debugging efforts
Copyright 1988 (1:29:44 PM): thats one i found personally - not drakken
Copyright 1988 (1:29:57 PM): and it lead to other -- better -- hacks
Copyright 1988 (1:30:12 PM): yet -- much as i try i never saw any new connection thread opened
Copyright 1988 (1:30:28 PM): as you claim
Copyright 1988 (1:31:07 PM): but - as i posted -- ill eat crow on all this if i test
Copyright 1988 (1:31:25 PM): but i will of coures put it through the ringer first - and i will have formatted my hd first
Copyright 1988 (1:31:44 PM): but you never answered what
Copyright 1988 (1:31:51 PM):
neg eax
sbb eax, eax
Copyright 1988 (1:31:54 PM): meant in assembly
TouchTheTiny is away at 1:32:08 PM.
Copyright 1988 (1:32:19 PM): if (eax != 0) eax = -1;
Copyright 1988 (1:32:32 PM): and its HAMBURGLERS you pwned bitch
The master of question dodging lives amongst us -- MISS. In her down time she enjoys suckering noobs and spreading deciet. She enjoys long bullshit conversations and stringing noobs on by making false claims.
If you spot bullshitter -- vote yes