Can't tell if that was degrading or not... Well, I thought of batch cause I was on my Windows and because I never heard of Tiny BASIC - just thought you were naming it that. Sorry to have made you reply like that. :'(
Its actually more like Tiny BASIC.
:( i had some reading when i was bored.. now i am out of knowledge.
Oh! Kinda' like batch programming? Looks promising. Will try to use it when you're done... If you get done. -.- EDIT: Windows batch programming*
that's good
I am in favor of the landlord's point of view, great merit. By the way, the recent sevral years, the five finger shoes and Christian Louboutin NFL jerseys hair straighteners ugg boots are very popular, we might as well enjoy their beauty .
Too bad I can't +Rep a blog post. Kudos.
any chance of a non-signup required link?
I seem to have a ; fetish, sorry about that folks.
Does that **** have a pulse of it's own? Because I want to lovingly kill it and smoke it. :D
Razer | Get Imba Share & Win Contest
we is all masta crakerz, we is ll parts of anonymous n shiz, we be da onez craken all dat movie booty n dat game n app stuff. in factoids, we jus craked yo os, cuz you be all up in or siter, be prepares for ultimate wresltmania stuff!
this sounds hilarous
lol
wat teh ****?
That could present a problem, but there would be very few instances where an application may write over the code portion of one of its modules. All of the variables and structures referred to are handled dynamically, so if the main module was writing to those it wouldn't know the difference. Also, if the main module wrote to the modified library it would be doing so strictly by using the memory reference it received when it loaded the module in the first place. Therefore it's extremely unlikely that it would read from the wrong memory location, as it would already have the necessary base address for the modified library and would not need to call GetModuleHandle().
i'm sure we'll see hacks never before seen.
is this about sc2 having no chat rooms?
hi bulk