Miss' Big Mick

[indulgence]

Copyright 1988 (12:52:37 PM): hey baby
TouchTheTiny (12:52:44 PM): hi
Copyright 1988 (12:53:44 PM): wanna voip me
Copyright 1988 (12:53:54 PM): or let me drop you line
TouchTheTiny (12:54:24 PM): why
TouchTheTiny (12:54:34 PM): i thought you thought i was a guy*rolls eyes*
Copyright 1988 (12:55:15 PM): well - you can prove me wrong then ?
TouchTheTiny (12:55:29 PM): yes i can but what will that accomplish?
Copyright 1988 (12:55:51 PM): proof of identity goes a long way
Copyright 1988 (12:56:00 PM): when i suspect you of being one "BrokenArrow"
Copyright 1988 (12:56:16 PM): or um wait lemme see what other aliases use your ip subnet
TouchTheTiny (12:56:22 PM): well it is your choice if you think ima guy w/e
TouchTheTiny (12:56:36 PM): theres BrokenArrow/Miss/T3CH and my brothers old one RaptorHunter13
TouchTheTiny (12:56:47 PM): funny thing is i dont even
TouchTheTiny (12:56:53 PM): I use plain old Rogers cable
TouchTheTiny (12:56:59 PM): and do nothing
TouchTheTiny (12:57:11 PM): it is very ****ed up though
Copyright 1988 (12:57:14 PM): well then -- you can put my skepticism to rest
TouchTheTiny (12:57:20 PM): if i restart my computer
Copyright 1988 (12:57:23 PM): as it is very funny that broken arrow and you
TouchTheTiny (12:57:24 PM): it says no connection found
Copyright 1988 (12:57:32 PM): both mispell "possible"
Copyright 1988 (12:57:34 PM): the same way
Copyright 1988 (12:57:37 PM): POSSIABLE
TouchTheTiny (12:57:40 PM): actually
TouchTheTiny (12:58:07 PM): in canada we spell it possiable its like colour in america its color in canada its colour
TouchTheTiny (12:58:15 PM): and BrokenArrow is me
Copyright 1988 (12:58:26 PM): well then you can put the skepticism to rest
Copyright 1988 (12:58:53 PM): becaue theres more skeptecism than just this -- but this is a step
TouchTheTiny (12:59:19 PM): you made it you deal with it
TouchTheTiny (12:59:46 PM): i dont see why i have to go out of my way to proove anything for a bunch of ******* perverts
TouchTheTiny (12:59:53 PM): its not my fault they dont believe
Copyright 1988 (1:00:10 PM): um - well you make some outrageous claims
Copyright 1988 (1:00:17 PM): and no proof of identity other than an 'avatar'
Copyright 1988 (1:00:29 PM): well then look ima female too
Copyright 1988 (1:00:31 PM): ive got a lady avatar
TouchTheTiny (1:00:54 PM): take it from this
TouchTheTiny (1:01:03 PM): did i ever say that i was a girl?
Copyright 1988 (1:01:54 PM): lol no but you um portray that image
Copyright 1988 (1:01:59 PM): and you do so blatantly
Copyright 1988 (1:02:17 PM): ergo your implication that you are female is tied to the implication that your avatar is you
Copyright 1988 (1:02:24 PM): ergo my skepticism
TouchTheTiny (1:05:43 PM): I guess thats true but I know I am and don't need to prove it. Thats what counts. If you were on my friend I wouldn't mind but for the fact that I must prove to you dumbfounded people no
Copyright 1988 (1:06:20 PM): lol - see your notion of dismissing my valid criticisms is typical
Copyright 1988 (1:06:25 PM): you don't want to be discovered
Copyright 1988 (1:06:39 PM): i have offered perfectly legitimate means by which you could prove yourself
Copyright 1988 (1:06:47 PM): you make outrageous claims to hacks
Copyright 1988 (1:06:50 PM): coding in C++
TouchTheTiny (1:07:00 PM): btw
Copyright 1988 (1:07:05 PM): do you even know assembly?
TouchTheTiny (1:07:46 PM): "our proof involves sentence structure and word usage, ips, and email addresses.... as well as a few *cough* other items." what is this?
Copyright 1988 (1:08:04 PM): proof we have...
Copyright 1988 (1:08:11 PM): but answer my question and ill answer yours
Copyright 1988 (1:08:18 PM): do you know assembly?
TouchTheTiny (1:08:28 PM): i was asking first
Copyright 1988 (1:08:48 PM): no you werent
TouchTheTiny (1:08:50 PM): proove of what
Copyright 1988 (1:08:52 PM): i asked i can see when you type
TouchTheTiny (1:08:53 PM): poof*
Copyright 1988 (1:09:03 PM): im not asking for proof on this question necessarily --
TouchTheTiny (1:09:04 PM): i typed btw
Copyright 1988 (1:09:08 PM): DO YOU KNOW ASSEMBLY?!
TouchTheTiny (1:09:40 PM): hmmm I wouldn't have done it without
Copyright 1988 (1:11:00 PM): you wouldnt have done what without
Copyright 1988 (1:11:01 PM): what
TouchTheTiny (1:12:50 PM): ok yes i do
Copyright 1988 (1:13:04 PM): so youve gone through the starcraft disassembly i would presume
Copyright 1988 (1:13:13 PM): and youve run across this much like me a lot
Copyright 1988 (1:13:21 PM):
neg eax
sbb eax, eax
Copyright 1988 (1:13:27 PM): and you would know what that does right?
Copyright 1988 (1:15:20 PM): long pause *
Copyright 1988 (1:15:38 PM): http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-...art+of+assembly
Copyright 1988 (1:15:45 PM): sigh i know you are googling it probably
Copyright 1988 (1:15:59 PM): but that wont tell you the context of what its doing
Copyright 1988 (1:16:03 PM): ive seen it tons in starcraft
Copyright 1988 (1:16:18 PM): in some sections of code that you would have to have debugged a lot to create these 'hacks' you have
Copyright 1988 (1:16:42 PM): it just so happens to be how ms compiler compiles a certain set of code
Copyright 1988 (1:17:39 PM): wow -- no response?
Copyright 1988 (1:17:53 PM): hey honey -- why do you have to lie for?
Copyright 1988 (1:18:10 PM): half of the hacks you claim are impossible
Copyright 1988 (1:18:23 PM): the others are either so debugging intensive that i don't believe you
Copyright 1988 (1:18:33 PM): but i was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt
Copyright 1988 (1:19:52 PM): I mean you would obviously have the fxn offset to send unit commands as well then huh?
Copyright 1988 (1:20:09 PM): i mean its widely known that me, drakken, dt maybe others have it
Copyright 1988 (1:20:27 PM): so surely you have it too -- especially w/ auto build of scarabs - interceptors etc
Copyright 1988 (1:20:30 PM): and auto mining
Copyright 1988 (1:20:37 PM): all of those automations
Copyright 1988 (1:20:50 PM): so -- ill give you the 1 last chance -- this ones easy mind you
Copyright 1988 (1:21:02 PM): to prove yourself -- what is the fxn offset to send unit commands in starcraft
Copyright 1988 (1:21:21 PM): and i await your improbable response
TouchTheTiny (1:23:22 PM): http://www.bwhacks.com/forum/index.php?act...st=45#entry3203
TouchTheTiny (1:23:39 PM): now that u have wasted more of my time making me have to write so much again i hope u=
TouchTheTiny (1:23:44 PM): ur happy
Copyright 1988 (1:25:49 PM): lol
Copyright 1988 (1:25:54 PM): so no fxn offset eh
Copyright 1988 (1:26:00 PM): LOL figured as much
Copyright 1988 (1:26:23 PM): you cant share minerals
Copyright 1988 (1:26:27 PM): not possible dumbass
Copyright 1988 (1:26:34 PM): if you give minerals to an ally
Copyright 1988 (1:26:38 PM): say subtract urs
Copyright 1988 (1:26:40 PM): and add his
Copyright 1988 (1:26:50 PM): it will drop him when he spends the extra
Copyright 1988 (1:27:07 PM): mineral hack - impossible
Copyright 1988 (1:27:10 PM): synched on all clients
Copyright 1988 (1:27:17 PM): much like the stack hack
Copyright 1988 (1:27:21 PM): and fastest ladder
Copyright 1988 (1:27:28 PM): NOT ****ING POSSIBLE
Copyright 1988 (1:29:05 PM): and its also amazing that you retrieve ip from players during the map download
Copyright 1988 (1:29:11 PM): because i have debugged that thread
Copyright 1988 (1:29:14 PM): extensibly
Copyright 1988 (1:29:35 PM): i was able to spoof download counter through my debugging efforts
Copyright 1988 (1:29:44 PM): thats one i found personally - not drakken
Copyright 1988 (1:29:57 PM): and it lead to other -- better -- hacks
Copyright 1988 (1:30:12 PM): yet -- much as i try i never saw any new connection thread opened
Copyright 1988 (1:30:28 PM): as you claim
Copyright 1988 (1:31:07 PM): but - as i posted -- ill eat crow on all this if i test
Copyright 1988 (1:31:25 PM): but i will of coures put it through the ringer first - and i will have formatted my hd first
Copyright 1988 (1:31:44 PM): but you never answered what
Copyright 1988 (1:31:51 PM):
neg eax
sbb eax, eax
Copyright 1988 (1:31:54 PM): meant in assembly
TouchTheTiny is away at 1:32:08 PM.
Copyright 1988 (1:32:19 PM): if (eax != 0) eax = -1;
Copyright 1988 (1:32:32 PM): and its HAMBURGLERS you pwned bitch

The master of question dodging lives amongst us -- MISS. In her down time she enjoys suckering noobs and spreading deciet. She enjoys long bull**** conversations and stringing noobs on by making false claims.

If you spot bull****ter -- vote yes

[Sandman]

Dude, aren't you being a little harsh?

I mean, there's bound to be a bigger bull****ter out there somewhere, right? Biggest ever is pretty strong.

And he's definitely not the MASTER of question dodging. That's me, bitch. Go ahead, ask me anything and I'll dodge it like a mother****er. I give props for the valiant effort, though.

[Miss]

My brother had to go on so I got off.

We have agreed on a bet

TouchTheTiny: oh read the wrong thing :-)
TouchTheTiny: Will you like to make a bet? When you try it out and find that its not a trojan and that everything works you step down as administrator, apoligize to me and comment that you were wrong. I then get your spot
TouchTheTiny: :-)
TouchTheTiny: how bout it
TouchTheTiny: and if i lose i will leave BW and GT and never bother any of u again
Copyright 1988: aye
Copyright 1988: ill do that
TouchTheTiny: so msg me i gotta go again but is the bet on?
Copyright 1988: correct
TouchTheTiny: ok
TouchTheTiny: :
)
Copyright 1988: remember
TouchTheTiny: :-)*
Copyright 1988: BEFORE July 31st
TouchTheTiny: and u cant be added back either no matter what
Copyright 1988: i agree to that
Copyright 1988: because i know half that ****s impossible
Copyright 1988: why not bet me the sun is going to rise tomorrow
TouchTheTiny: well we will see then
Copyright 1988: lol

~Miss

[indulgence]

ill go ahead an post my log so its confirmed...

I would like to point out that she said EVERYTHING works -- and BEFORE JULY 31st -- Seeing as half the ****s impossible I dont consider it a bet so much as embarassing this poor wannabe

TouchTheTiny (1:53:48 PM): back
TouchTheTiny (1:54:01 PM): so you will pick me up on my bet?
Copyright 1988 (1:54:12 PM): you never made a bet
Copyright 1988 (1:54:15 PM): ive logged the chat
Copyright 1988 (1:54:17 PM): no bets there
TouchTheTiny (1:54:35 PM): you destroyed my post
TouchTheTiny (1:54:40 PM): I made a bet with you
Copyright 1988 (1:54:44 PM): i did nothing of the sort
Copyright 1988 (1:54:56 PM): do i have to copy+paste the admin logs
TouchTheTiny (1:54:59 PM): oh read the wrong thing :-)
TouchTheTiny (1:55:31 PM): Will you like to make a bet? When you try it out and find that its not a trojan and that everything works you step down as administrator, apoligize to me and comment that you were wrong. I then get your spot
TouchTheTiny (1:55:41 PM): :-)
TouchTheTiny (1:55:44 PM): how bout it
TouchTheTiny (1:56:18 PM): and if i lose i will leave BW and GT and never bother any of u again
Copyright 1988 (1:56:38 PM): aye
Copyright 1988 (1:56:41 PM): ill do that
TouchTheTiny (1:56:46 PM): so msg me i gotta go again but is the bet on?
Copyright 1988 (1:56:52 PM): correct
TouchTheTiny (1:56:54 PM): ok
TouchTheTiny (1:56:57 PM): :
)
Copyright 1988 (1:56:58 PM): remember
TouchTheTiny (1:56:59 PM): :-)*
Copyright 1988 (1:57:03 PM): BEFORE July 31st
TouchTheTiny (1:57:10 PM): and u cant be added back either no matter what
Copyright 1988 (1:58:08 PM): i agree to that
Copyright 1988 (1:58:15 PM): because i know half that ****s impossible
Copyright 1988 (1:58:22 PM): why not bet me the sun is going to rise tomorrow
TouchTheTiny (1:58:30 PM): well we will see then
Copyright 1988 (1:59:33 PM): lol
TouchTheTiny (2:00:56 PM): where do u live
Copyright 1988 (2:01:12 PM): TN
Copyright 1988 (2:01:28 PM): see i dont hide behind an avatar and shrug ppl off
TouchTheTiny (2:01:37 PM): and
Copyright 1988 (2:01:39 PM): i am willing to provide proof of identity
TouchTheTiny (2:01:40 PM): if i let u phone me
TouchTheTiny (2:01:47 PM): will you drop it
Copyright 1988 (2:01:51 PM): indeed
TouchTheTiny (2:01:56 PM): ok
TouchTheTiny (2:02:00 PM): when i get back
Copyright 1988 (2:02:07 PM): lol convenient
Copyright 1988 (2:02:10 PM): but alright
TouchTheTiny signed off at 2:05:52 PM.

[Valkaire]

My friend lives in canada and this is what he had to say:

(13:13:15) supervalkaire@hotmail.com: http://www.bwhacks.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=391
(13:16:38) permaphr0st@hotmail.com: LOL
LOL
LOL
LOL
Copyright 1988 (12:57:32 PM): both mispell "possible"

Copyright 1988 (12:57:34 PM): the same way

Copyright 1988 (12:57:37 PM): POSSIABLE

TouchTheTiny (12:57:40 PM): actually

TouchTheTiny (12:58:07 PM): in canada we spell it possiable its like colour in america its color in canada its colour

TouchTheTiny (12:58:15 PM): and BrokenArrow is me

WTF
LMFAO
WE DO NOT!!

And also, a bigger bull****ter can be found here:
http://www.cubedivision.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=138

[Sandman]

Sandman: hey, maybe you can answer this for me
Sandman: do canadians spell possible as possiable?
Etrigan: hell no
Etrigan: Around here, we beat the **** outta rednecks that spell it like that.

[indulgence]

I hope everyone saw the multiple opportunities I gave her to prove/validify her arguments yet she either evaded the question or just ignored it and brought something new up 10 minutes later (assembly question)

I disbelieved the canada statement as well -- but gave her the benefit of the doubt in the convo...

[Miss]

Wow that must make millions of people retarted since

http://www.google.ca/search?q=possia...-8&hl=en&meta=



~Miss

[jonthepyro]

funny, but ur still a bull****er until u show off your new progy

[Fallen]

Originally posted by jonthepyro@Jun 30 2004, 10:29 PM
funny, but ur still a bull****er until u show off your new progy

U know if she does make all these hacks work, she might rethink of making it public since u think shes a "bull****er"

[Crocomire]

Originally posted by jonthepyro@Jun 30 2004, 10:29 PM
funny, but ur still a bull****er until u show off your new progy

U know if she does make all these hacks work, she might rethink of making it public since u think shes a "bull****er"

AND... if they end up not working she could say that it's gonna be private for cover up when she's actually covering up for it not working... but thats just and IF statement... and i talk to much

[jonthepyro]

shes guna make it private this blah,shes gunna make it private that blah,
if shes all threatening to make it private than whyd she post this info about the prog so soon, she shouldve just waited until it was done than posted it and she wouldnt have the trouble of ppl bitchin at her and not believing her.. hope this prog is real tho

[Valkaire]

Originally posted by Miss@Jun 30 2004, 10:19 PM
Wow that must make millions of people retarted since

http://www.google.ca/search?q=possia...-8&hl=en&meta=



~Miss

I do believe it's spelt retarded, not retarted. And Sandman and I have confirmed from TWO seperate canadians.

And about the spelling of "possiable," http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=possiable.

[Gantznaught]

indulgence, maybe we got off on a rough start by Im glad to tell you that i share your ideals. :D

[indulgence]

Originally posted by Feemason@Jul 1 2004, 04:21 AM
indulgence, maybe we got off on a rough start by Im glad to tell you that i share your ideals. :D

Everyone sees the light if they look at the facts rather than hope in some noob dream

[jonthepyro]

And about the spelling of "possiable," http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=possiable.

No entry found for possiable.
Did you mean "possible"?

haha go dictionary.reference.com!

[NAATYE]

Sorry I had to make the stupid noob vote.... It is just too damn fun to help the ignorant with there self esteem issues, whilst demeaning myself at the same time. Not to mention I find it hard to believe that *it* (gender is to be determined) is the offspring of a dog. Although I must admit the possibly unintentional irony involved with the first choice is tempting. Provo!

[Valkaire]

Originally posted by jonthepyro@Jul 1 2004, 10:51 AM

And about the spelling of "possiable," http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=possiable.

No entry found for possiable.
Did you mean "possible"?

haha go dictionary.reference.com!

Urm, no not really, I was proving that no such word exists.

[Fallen]

Um who cares if someone misspelled a word? I mean its not the end of the world, but these people keep posting gay **** about how possiable could be a word. Yall have to stop and think, crying over one word, is that how you want to spend the rest of your pathetic lives? I mean really, yall cant be that bored.
And i was the other one who voted no on the poll. ( f.y.i. )

[Sandman]

Pardon me while I point out the obvious for the ****-witted.

It wasn't that it was spelled wrong, it was the way she spelled it. Indulgence just pointed out that she spelled it the same way as when she was calling herself BrokenArrow on GT. She confirmed that she was BrokenArrow, and she said that that's how possible is spelled in Canada. That is what sparked the disproving. It's not exactly the same as nit-picking over typos, which seems to be what you see it as.

Do you really want to be spending the rest of your ill-conceived, pathetic, meaningless, dull, overstretched and unwanted existence crying over other people debating the spelling of a word? I mean really, you can't be that bored.